Presidential Candidate Selector
Here are my results from the the SelectSmart.com 2004 AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE SELECTOR quiz. I got interesting results.
1. Kucinich, Cong. Dennis, OH - Democrat (100%)
2. Dean, Gov. Howard, VT - Democrat (76%)
3. Sharpton, Reverend Al - Democrat (73%)
4. Kerry, Senator John, MA - Democrat (58%)
5. Gephardt, Cong. Dick, MO - Democrat (56%)
6. Edwards, Senator John, NC - Democrat (51%)
7. Libertarian Candidate (50%)
8. Moseley-Braun, Former Senator Carol IL - Democrat (49%)
9. Lieberman Senator Joe CT - Democrat (47%)
10. Graham, Senator Bob, FL - Democrat (30%)
11. Phillips, Howard - Constitution (27%)
12. Bush, George W. - US President (20%)
13. LaRouche, Lyndon H. Jr. - Democrat (-12%)
Eliminate those who have no chance of being elected (Kucinich, Sharpton, Moseley-Braun, etc.), and it’s just about right. I can’t strongly support any candidate right now, though I did vote in the MoveOn.org online primary.
Sphere: Related Content
July 3rd, 2003 at 6:50 pm
My results are:
1. Kucinich, Cong. Dennis, OH - Democrat (100%) Click here for info
2. Edwards, Senator John, NC - Democrat (82%) Click here for info
3. Gephardt, Cong. Dick, MO - Democrat (79%) Click here for info
4. Dean, Gov. Howard, VT - Democrat (74%) Click here for info
5. Kerry, Senator John, MA - Democrat (69%) Click here for info
6. Moseley-Braun, Former Senator Carol IL - Democrat (67%) Click here for info
7. Graham, Senator Bob, FL - Democrat (66%) Click here for info
8. Sharpton, Reverend Al - Democrat (62%) Click here for info
9. Lieberman Senator Joe CT - Democrat (56%) Click here for info
10. Phillips, Howard - Constitution (22%) Click here for info
11. Bush, George W. - US President (17%) Click here for info
12. Libertarian Candidate (17%) Click here for info
13. LaRouche, Lyndon H. Jr. - Democrat (-6%)
If many of us agree with Kucinich, then WHY doesn’t he have a chance? This is the problem. We vote for the person we think will win instead of the guy who most closely agrees with our view.
Of course, my number 2 and 3 person are at least agreeable to me.
January 24th, 2006 at 5:31 am
seems very interesting!