Harvey H. Jackson, a professor of history at Jacksonville State University, offers yet another modest proposal for Alabama in this morning’s Anniston Star,
What if the governor’s “Plan A” for solving our financial crisis is rejected? Will there be a “Plan B”? And what will “Plan B” be?
Well, let me advance a modest proposal, based on an idea floated by my buddy Gene Owens of the Mobile Register. Gene suggests that if Judge Moore would rule “that church and state are one and the same in Alabama,” the state would be “entitled to collect tithes” and with 10 percent from everyone every year, our money worries would be over.
It sounds like exactly the scenario that could win a lot of support from people in Alabama. We seem to have this burning need to have the church solve all of our problems. Let’s give them the chance! The real beauty is that it doesn’t even violate the First Ammendment, because as we have all been told by our good friends who pay attention to such things there is no separation of church and state. There is only the requirement that Congress not establish a religion. This wouldn’t be Congress, it would be the State of Alabama making the church the same as the state.
He continues,
And the church, which is also the state, would make sure roads were built and maintained, criminals were caught, convicted and put away (so they could be visited), health facilities were maintained, schools were up and running so all God’s children got an equal and sufficient education, old folks and little babies were cared for, and so on and so on and so on.
And there would be plenty of money to do this.
You see, according to my calculations (which are just as good as anybody else’s), the state would actually collect more revenue under my plan because rich folks and corporations would not have all those loopholes and exemptions so they would actually pay a larger percentage of their income by tithing than they do now. Meanwhile the poor, freed from all those regressive taxes, might actually pay less.
And since this money is given to the church, you can write it off on your federal tax return — a charitable contribution!
Now how about that, a system that is financially sound, that provides the services Alabamians need and deserve, that does not exploit the poor, and gives you a federal tax break in the bargain.
Whoa! Could this be what the Christian Coalition means when it says that good stewardship will solve our problems? That sneaky bunch.
One step ahead of me.
I think Professor Jackson is onto something.