I have not yet weighed in on the Plame/Wilson controversy, but it has certainly been covered to the hilt across the blogosphere(here, here, and here for instance). My first reaction was disgust at the dirty tactics of the White House. My second reaction, based on reading Bob Novak’s column explaining how the leak occurred, was that this was being blown out of proportion. If it was “common knowledge”, then obviously Ms. Plame couldn’t have been an undercover operative. Then, it’s reported that she was in fact an undercover agent. As this story continues to unfold, I’m sure I’ll be turned around again, but right now I have to agree with the father of Mike Spann (CIA agent from Alabama, killed in Afghanistan),
The father of slain CIA officer Johnny “Mike” Spann of Winfield said Thursday he believes an independent counsel should investigate allegations that someone in the Bush administration exposed a CIA officer’s identity - an act he called treasonous.
Spann, the first American killed in Afghanistan, died in a prison uprising. His father, also named Johnny Spann, said he is still angry because he thinks his son’s identity and hometown were disclosed before his son’s family could be adequately protected.
Democrats in Congress, led by Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., are calling for a special counsel to be appointed to investigate who exposed a CIA operative who is married to a former ambassador, Joseph C. Wilson. Wilson had accused the administration of manipulating intelligence to exaggerate the threat posed by Iraq.
“If someone in the Bush administration leaked this, they need to be punished, and they need to be made an example of, because that’s not just a leak, that’s treason,” Spann, who lives in Winfield, said. “They should appoint an independent counsel so the American people can be sure, and let the chips fall where they may.”
Go Mr. Spann!
UPDATE: Paul Krugman gives this scenario as what should have happened in this morning’s NY Times,
On July 14, Robert Novak published the now-famous column in which he identified Valerie Plame, the wife of former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, as a C.I.A. “operative on weapons of mass destruction,” and said “two senior administration officials” had told him that she was responsible for her husband’s mission to Niger. On that mission, Mr. Wilson concluded — correctly — that reports of Iraqi efforts to buy uranium were bogus.
An outraged President Bush immediately demanded the names of those responsible for exposing Ms. Plame. He repeated his father’s statement that “those who betray the trust by exposing the names of our sources” are “the most insidious of traitors.” There are limits to politics, Mr. Bush declared; Mr. Wilson’s decision to go public about his mission had embarrassed him, but that was no excuse for actions that were both felonious and unpatriotic.