Polls

Which Alabama legislator is most effective at using Twitter?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Blog Rating

Average blog rating:

9.4

Myths on Both Sides in Healthcare Debate

I came across an excellent column about the myths on both sides of the healthcare debate this morning from a writer in Maine named Gordon Weil, because he starts out debunking myths being spread by our own Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL)

Myth 1. Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., says that Obama risks “destroying the best health-care system the world has ever known.” In reality, it is far from the best.

Because an estimated 50 million Americans do not have any health insurance, they have little access and get less care. For them, we do not have the best system.

Life expectancy in Japan, France and many other countries is greater than in the U.S. Infant mortality is higher in the U.S. than in many other countries.

We rank first in only two categories. We spend more per person on health care than any other country, and we have the best emergency rooms.

Myth 2. Shelby says there is a “marketplace for health care” — competition among insurers and providers that supposedly produces lower costs and the best care.

But care is not the best. And the federal government itself has banned competition in drug pricing under prescription insurance plans.

Recently, we learned that health care costs in McAllen, Texas, were the highest in the country because almost all doctors there ordered tests without limit. Average medical costs were higher than average income.

What kind of marketplace is that?

In Rochester, Minn., where the famed Mayo Clinic is located, costs were little more than one-third of the McAllen “market.”

The healthcare system we have is far from the best in the world, though we do have the best doctors, hospitals and the latest and greatest technology. The problem is that in order to have a good healthcare system, you have to have ALL citizens getting healthcare, until we fill that gap, we will continue to lag behind the rest of the world.

And on the other side he offers the following myths,

Myth 6. We can reform health care without raising taxes.

You cannot cover millions more people without added cost. If government mandates more coverage, government should pay for it. That means higher taxes or more debt.

The only way to lower costs and cover more people would be a single-payer system. Taxes would replace insurance premiums. Covering added costs through savings is an empty promise.

Even if government purchasing power lowers some costs, health-care reform means somebody’s taxes will increase.

Myth 7. Obama has a health-care plan.

Having seen the failure of President Clinton’s effort to impose a plan, Obama is leaving too much to Congress. He needs to take charge.

As much as many want to lay the responsibility for the plans currently working their way through Congress firmly at the feet of the President, the issue is that he did not propose a detailed plan and is not dictating the details to Congress. He started to lay out a few additional parameters this week, but he needs to do more to chart the course for Congress and keep the bill-writing process moving. Otherwise, it will stagnate and the opportunity to get a deal done this year will be lost.

Too many millions of Americans have gone too long without affordable, accessible healthcare and we cannot let this opportunity slip away. I know the President knows that, but he needs to start providing the strong leadership needed to get it done.

Health-care debate complicated by myths from both sides.

Healthcare Reform: The Opposition I Respect

My twitter friends have been exhausting me with all the debate on healthcare, but as always, it just makes my argument stronger to have good honest and open debate. The issue I have at the moment is that there is so much misinformation being shoveled by the insurance companies and their allies that it’s hard to keep up.

Even after many debates and many accusations, I still have yet to see one person point out anything in the healthcare reform proposals in Congress that is different than what was advertised. I also still see healthcare reform passing this year. Everyone knew it would not be easy, but thanks to a better response team than was in place during the Clinton years and better information flow to and from both sides through the Internet, no ONE lie can gain enough traction to become the truth for many.

Now, don’t get me wrong, there are people who have honest opposition to the bill and its proposals, but those oppositions are things that either can still be negotiated or have been negotiated to the point where they are. And I respect anyone who has honest disagreements in the following areas:

1. The insurance mandate: there was a lot of back and forth on this one during the campaign and even the President stood opposed to it, but if you’re going to get to universal care, it’s necessary. The exact structure of it and what the penalties should be have a basic framework in the bills working their way through Congress, but the terms are not non-negotiable.

2. The surtax: Even Speaker Pelosi acknowledges that there may need to be some adjustments made to the levels at which the surtax kicks in. Her theory being there are lots of Americans that hope to make over $250K someday (though the vast majority never will), but fewer believe they will make over $500K. That’s fine, but the reality is that there will be a surtax as part of the funding mechanism for the bill.

3. The public option: The President has stepped up the rhetoric on this one, insisting on this being part of the plan. I still think the idea of it being triggered after a certain period of time may be resurrected at some point along the way. Much like charter schools in public school reform, the THREAT of a public option may be just as effective as actually having one, though I am still strongly in support of having a public option as part of the plan.

As far as I’m concerned, all of the other BS that is flying around is just that and is a waste of time. If you have honest opposition in these three areas, I respect your opinion, but don’t get too frustrated til you see the final product, because it may look different. If your opposition is more fundamental than this (i.e. don’t want “government-run” healthcare, universal coverage is a pipe dream, it’s too expensive, I don’t want to pay for other people’s insurance, etc.), I hate to be the one to tell you, but you’ve already lost.

ASEA’s Budget Got Substantial Boost from Nationwide Insurance

The way things were supposed to work: the Alabama State Employee’s Association (ASEA) recommends a deferred compensation plan to the state personnel board, on behalf of employees. The State Personnel Board then reviews and approves that plan. Then, ASEA is responsible for promoting the plan to its employees. What went wrong?

According to a court filing, Nationwide Insurance began making payments to ASEA without the knowledge of the personnel board. Presumably, to pay for the promotion of the program and the continued endorsement of ASEA. Those contributions made up a significant portion of ASEA’s budget…”1.2 million of 3 million in total revenue in 2006″. On top of that, some employees got shoddy service from the company, leading to the lawsuit which revealed the under the table arrangement with the employees’ union.

This is exactly why the reputation of the state employees union stinks, and rightfully so. They deserve whatever heat they get for this one and Executive Director Mac MacArthur personally deserves to be put through the ringer as well.

Nationwide major money source for lobbying group | montgomeryadvertiser.com | Montgomery Advertiser.

UPDATE: If you’re a state employee, this is the ONLY period during the year (the last 10 working days of July) that you can STOP making payments and disenroll from the ASEA. In order to do it you have to contact the payroll department in your agency. Consider doing it today.

Healthcare Reform for Alabamians: Is it Really Too Much To Ask?

For those who want to slowdown the healthcare reform train and for those who say what’s the rush? I say, as Congressman Davis says, over 2500 Alabamians are losing their health insurance every week, they should not have to wait to ensure that they will have adequate care.

And to those who say this bill will overly burden small business. I say, this bill gives small businesses a 50% tax credit on their cost for health insurance, how is that increasing the burden?

And to those who don’t want to see taxes raised, I say first, only a very small percentage of Americans are being asked to pay, and second, is it really too much to ask someone who’s making $400,000 a year to pay an extra $42/month to ensure that no American will have to worry about losing their job or being denied coverage by insurance companies for pre-existing conditions or any of the other reasons people lose their medical coverage?

What we’re talking about is radical, yes, but not in the sense that many want to portray. It isn’t radical in terms of the government “taking over” healthcare. It isn’t radical in terms of cost, the numbers may sound large, but in the overall scheme of what is paid for medical services in this country, they aren’t significant. What’s radical is the concept that you won’t constantly have to look over your shoulder and wonder where your medical care will come from. What’s radical is you won’t be stuck in a dead-end job, just because of the medical benefits. What’s radical is that you won’t be forced to go into bankruptcy when a loved one gets a tragic illness.

What we are being asked to give up to get those things is not too much to ask.

Left In Alabama:: President Obama’s Weekly Address – Health Care Reform Cannot Wait.