Mooncat did a great job of breaking down the Obama results by county yesterday (Left In Alabama:: Alabama Presidential Elections: Barack Did Better, But Not Enough Better). I too am very encouraged by the results in the big counties (Jefferson, Montgomery and Mobile) and also agree that the state party abandoned the presidential ticket in the 5th Congressional District, which is unfortunate.
However, I read this as opportunity for a statewide candidate. I read these numbers as an indication of where a statewide Democratic candidate needs to put some boots on the ground. Remember that Obama had very little investment in Alabama, whereas a candidate for governor, for instance, should put significant time into talking to the voters in those counties that didn’t go for Obama this time.
I firmly believe the counties that went for Clinton in 1996 and showed degradation between ‘04 and ‘08: Cherokee, Colbert, Crenshaw, Etowah, Fayette, Franklin, Jackson, Marion, Walker and Washington are certainly winnable by a candidate for statewide office. So, I believe what these numbers do for a statewide candidate is tell him/her where the work needs to be done to win over voters in some areas more than others.
I’m encouraged about the chances for a Democratic governor of Alabama 2010 and particularly excited that we have our first African-American governor, just two years after our first African-American president.
UPDATE: The Birmingham News covered the 2010 angle very differently. While Artur Davis said,
“Voters put on a different lens when they are assessing presidential races in the South than they do when they are assessing races involving people they’ve gotten to know,”
(which I agree with 100%, see the analysis above) Others said this,
“In my judgment, it’s not a good sign,” said University of Alabama political scientist William Stewart. “Even a white Democrat is having a hard time winning an important statewide office. An African-American Democrat would have even a steeper hill to climb.”
The University of Virginia’s Southern politics expert, Larry Sabato, said Davis’ running for governor in Alabama would not be like Obama running for the U.S. Senate in Illinois in 2004 or L. Douglas Wilder running for governor in Virginia in 1989.
“Alabama is a heavily conservative, Republican state,” Sabato said in an e-mail. “Anything’s possible, but Davis would never be viewed as a front-runner or favorite to win in November. Obama’s win may make race less important in the future, but I’m not sure that will be true in Alabama for a long time.”
If you look at on a county-by-county basis, it is not so insurmountable. There are counties that are already firmly Democratic and a number of others that went blue this time around for Obama. If the investment is made in a ground game for an African-American candidate who is even more conservative than Obama in many ways, the climb will be uphill, but not insurmountable.