Polls

What is your preferred method to balance the Alabama education budget?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Blog Rating

Average blog rating:

9.4

Day 1: Getting Started and State of the State

First, Erin Dixon did a great job of summarizing the day, so I won’t duplicate her efforts.

HIGHLIGHTS:   The Alabama Senate voted both to block the employee furlough plan that was approved by the state personnel board and to block a code of ethics that was approved by the state education board.  The Senate Finance and Taxation – General Fund committee also approved a $1 billion highway construction program and a bill to ban most no-bid state contracts.  The House swore in three new members and approved a resolution honoring the national championship football team at Alabama.

Of course, the primetime event was  Governor Riley delivering his final state of the state address this evening.  It was my first time attending the speech in person, and I have to admit it was a bit surreal.  Having the who’s who of Alabama politics all in that small of a space was very interesting for a politico like me.

Prior to the speech, I spoke with Rep. Cam Ward about his expectations for the coming session.  We talked about the budget situation and Rep. Ward’s belief that we are likely going to be forced to look at reforming pension plans and contributions for state employees and teachers, as uncomfortable as that may be in order to balance the budget moving forward.

Rep. Ward also stated that he has not yet seen the charter school legislation the governor announced yesterday and that he was open to the idea.  However, he would like to see it done on a pilot basis to see if it works here, and if not then we are able to pull back, rather than “throwing the doors open” and allowing schools all over the state.  Also, while touching on education he indicated he may have differences with Governor Riley when it comes to maintaining the Reading Initiative and Math/Science Initiative.  Rep. Ward’s belief is that if you end up pitting a program’s where much of the emphasis is on training (and most everyone has already been trained) against increasing classroom sizes all over the state, he would be more inclined to support “pausing” the initiatives for a year rather than increasing classroom size.

Finally we discussed ethics reform, and specifically, Rep. Ward’s proposal to give the ethics commission subpoena power.  He is encouraged that Rep. Alvin Holmes (with whom he agrees on almost nothing from a policy standpoint) is also proposing a bill to do the same thing.  He is hopeful that there is more support this session for such a provision and said he really doesn’t care who gets the credit, as long as we get a good bill passed.

It was a good discussion to have headed into the governor’s speech that had little that was unexpected, he hit the notes everyone saw coming…the budget, economic development, ethics reform, education, gambling, PACT, the UA national championship.  It was all there.  The most tense moments, viewing from the gallery, were during the section on gambling, when all eyes turned on Attorney General Troy King and Agriculture Commissioner Ron Sparks who have been on the opposite side from the governor on issues related to gambling.

And the greatest moment of unity was when the governor acknowledged the Crimson Tide’s national championship, which was the first moment that the entire audience rose and applauded.  The governor seemed impressed that the standing ovation included House Minority Leader Mike Hubbard, who represents the Auburn area and runs the Auburn Sports Network.  When the ovation was complete, the governor was heard to say “I’m proud of you Mike.”

After the speech, gubernatorial candidate Artur Davis gave me his reaction.  Of the governor’s communication style, he said, “I believe Governor Riley has developed into one of the most skilled communicators in southern politics…and I’m glad he isn’t running for a third term.”  We also discussed the content of the speech, particularly gambling, where Congressman Davis views himself as somewhere between the current governor and his Democratic opponent in the gubernatorial primary, Agriculture Commissioner Ron Sparks.  He believes Commissioner Sparks wants to “grow gambling” to have more to tax.  His position (as he has repeatedly stated) is to tax what we have, but not focus on it as a growth industry.

I certainly think this governor’s final state of the state was memorable and laid out a strong case for why he stands where he does on the issues.  It doesn’t change the basic dynamics of the legislature over the his two terms though, and I don’t think anyone is expecting significantly different results on many of his high priority issues.

UPDATE:  Rep. Ward released the following statement following the speech,

“I applaud Governor Riley for a bold legislative agenda, and I stand ready to assist his efforts in the House of Representatives,” Rep. Ward said following the State of the State address. “The fact that 2010 is an election year should not impede the passage of meaningful legislation,” Rep. Ward added.

Cam Ward has introduced legislation in past sessions to authorize the Alabama Ethics Commission to have subpoena power to question witnesses and examine documents in proceedings of wrongdoing by public officials, but the bills have failed to pass both houses. Rep. Ward has filed similar legislation this session.

“If ever there was a time for ethics reform in Alabama, it is now,” Rep. Ward stated. “I am on board with this as well as getting Alabamians back to work and jumpstarting our economy,” he added.

Rep. Ward says he also favors offering tax incentives to bring new industry to Alabama and expand existing businesses. In fact, he has filed the “Alabama Job Growth Act” which incorporates some of the Governor’s proposals to rev up the state’s economy.

Wife of Candidate for Governor Resigns Post in Riley Administration

I have received confirmation from multiple sources that Kathy Johnson, the wife of Alabama gubernatorial candidate and former ADECA Director Bill Johnson, has resigned her position as Director of the Alabama Broadband Initiative and Connecting Alabama in the administration of Governor Bob Riley.  This announcement is sure to reduce the discomfort within the administration and for the Johnson campaign as the candidate tries to outline his differences with the current administration and other candidates in 2010.

UPDATE: The Birmingham News has spoken to Ms. Johnson and confirmed she submitted her resignation yesterday and her last day will be January 15th.

UPDATE 2: The Montgomery Advertiser adds text from her letter to the Governor,

“Thank you for the opportunity to organize, launch and advance your statewide broadband effort,” she wrote. “We have seen enormous successes since its inception in May 2008.”

 

Editorial Misses Key Points on Bryce Situation

I understand that folks in Tuscaloosa are not happy about the idea of losing Bryce Hospital and the jobs that come with it, but the <i>Tuscaloosa News</i> editorial board goes through some serious pains to twist the truth behind the situation in order to make their point.  Let’s start with the second paragraph:

Riley has claimed that local leaders are seeking legislation to require that a portion of any sale of Bryce be paid to Tuscaloosa. State Rep. Alan Harper, D-Alliceville, drafted the legislation months ago and took it to the Governor’s Office, but it has never been filed as a bill. No local elected officials we have spoken with are supporting that as proposed legislation.

So Rep. Harper brings the bill to the Governor and he IS a local leader.  How is Governor Riley wrong in his claim exactly?  And then we have this:

Commissioner Houston said Tuesday that Tuscaloosa County does more to care for stray animals than for people with mental illness in our community. Not only is that insulting, but it is also false. Local hospitals, social service agencies and even the local jail have borne a heavy burden for caring for people Bryce has released into the community.

What Commissioner Houston has said, in response to claims that Tuscaloosa was being “neglected” by the Department of Mental Health, is that two-thirds of the facility funding for the Department goes to Tuscaloosa County, while the county only contributes $25,000, the same amount they contribute to the animal shelter.  His point being that if mental health is such a priority for Tuscaloosa, why hasn’t the money been invested where the supposed priority is?

The counter-argument from the editorial board is bogus because Bryce serves patients from all over the state and when they are released back into the community they go home, they don’t hang around Tuscaloosa.  There is no doubt there are additional burdens, but they don’t fall disproportionately on Tuscaloosa.

The editorial then continues the same old line of argument about Tuscaloosa’s pride in serving the mentally ill of Alabama…an argument that continues to be raised, but as the Commissioner’s statement questions, Where’s the beef?  Where’s the evidence that location makes any difference in the quality of service provided?

Then we get the argument Birmingham should not be “allowed” to bid for public services.  Excuse me, but isn’t this exactly what the Governor and Commissioner Houston have been talking about, a community putting some dollars behind all the talk?  If Tuscaloosa really wants to keep the facility in their community, shouldn’t they be forced to put forward something more than talk?

Then we get the kicker conclusion that the ONLY logical choice is to build a new facility in Tuscaloosa…considering the argument laid out in this editorial, I hardly think logic is what they should be hanging their hat on to win the day.  As former Mental Health Commissioner Kathy Sawyer said in a public meeting in Tuscaloosa last month:

“As long as I am working on this project, I am going to do everything possible, should there be a sale, if Bryce is relocated, it’s going to be here,” Sawyer said. “And the only reason it won’t be is because this community can’t come up with the creative ways to keep it here.”

As always, your comments are appreciated below.

UPDATE:  I don’t mean this to be interpreted as an endorsement of shifting the clients and jobs from Tuscaloosa to Carraway.  What frustrates me is that there people in Tuscaloosa who think it shouldn’t even be a discussion.  I agree with former Commissioner Sawyer that there will have to be more creativity in Tuscaloosa if a brand new facility is to be built there.  Not only should there be a debate between Carraway and a brand new facility in Tuscaloosa, but there should be a discussion that if there is going to be a brand new facility where it would be built.  And ultimately the decision about what to do resides with the Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health who is an appointee of the Governor, not with any elected official in Tuscaloosa.

Gambling Sucking All Political Air in Alabama

The issue of gambling in Alabama is continuing to take up a lot of space in the political discussions around the state.  It’s getting more and more difficult to dicsuss anything else.

Sebastian Kitchen does an excellent job in the Montgomery Advertiser this morning laying out where we currently are in the controversy over bingo machines in Alabama.  The most recent development was a letter that Governor Riley sent to state legislators in response to a letter they received from Randy Brinson of the Christian Coalition of Alabama.  Brinson’s letter said, in part,

 The most important point is that even if the Alabama Supreme Court rules in such a way that electronic bingo is found to be illegal, as long as paper bingo is allowed, the Indians will be allowed to continue their gaming operations thereby creating a monopoly for the Indians. This is very settled in previous federal case law.

And Riley responded,

make no mistake … the claim that our enforcement of Alabama’s anti-gambling laws in the Alabama Supreme Court will guarantee exclusive rights to Indian casinos is a bald-faced lie.

It seems like there is a fundamental disagreement, between the Governor and Attorney General Troy King, go figure, over some documents and procedures laid out by the federal government.  A lawyer who specializes in gambling issues also sides with King and says the Governor is wrong on the law, that if any Class II gambling is allowed (which includes traditional paper bingo) than all Class II gambling is allowed for tribal entities.  In other words, under the Indian gaming act, the recent ruling from the Alabama Supreme Court really has no impact on those gaming establishments.

You add to this the additional layer that former Riley administration official and candidate for governor Bill Johnson passed a polygraph this week around his claims that the governor took significant contributions from the Mississippi Choctaw Indians (a claim the Governor has strongly denied) and we have a real political firestorm continuing to build.  Is the governor really only interested in eradicating all slot machines?  Is he planning to raid Victoryland and the Indian casinos next?

If so…things are fixing to get mighty, mighty interesting and there won’t be much time on local news broadcasts or the local papers to talk about anything else.  That would be extremely unfortunate for our state and its people.  While gambling is deeply concerning to some Alabamians, there are many other important issues we should investigating and discussing as well.

Your comments are welcome below.

UPDATE:  TWAY regular commenter waltm says over on Doc’s Political Parlor simply, It’s On.