I did receive a response from Rep. Wren to my earlier communication:
Kristopher,
I appreciate your views regarding HB116 and would like a chance to share a few thoughts of mine regarding this issue.
Under the Knight plan, approximately one-third of taxpaying families in the state would see their taxes increase dramatically, and small mom-and-pop businesses organized as limited liability companies would experience substantial increases at this time of unprecedented economic turmoil.
The Knight plan would also allow the state to double tax income by demanding that citizens pay state tax on income that never made it in the pockets but, instead, went to federal income taxes. In short, the bill places a tax on your taxes.
There are alternative methods to removing the sales tax on groceries. For instance one plan used in Idaho and supported by Alabama House Republicans, provides citizens who file state returns with a year-end rebate for the grocery taxes they pay. Because sales taxes are the only taxes that certain groups, such as illegal immigrants, actually pay, we can provide tax relief to Alabamians while ensuring those who are here illegally are contributing something to the state. Tourists and visitors from out-of-state would pay the sales taxes, as well, while in-state residents would be exempt.
Another solution offered by the Republican Caucus would phase in the removal of the state sales tax on food based on growth in the ETF and without increasing taxes on any individual or joint taxpayer. We continue to await the Democrats allowing consideration of a counter plan.
I hope that Republicans and Democrats alike can continue this discussion. During this time of record job losses and economic recession I realize that a 4% sales tax relief would be beneficial to citizens across the State of Alabama.
Thanks again for your comments.
Representative Greg Wren
Alabama House of Representatives
4213 Carmichael Road
Montgomery, AL 36106
334-395-0123 (O)
334-396-4787 (F)
www.gregwren.com
And I have responded to him as well:
Rep. Wren,
Again, I appreciate your willingness to dialogue on this issue, and I agree that Rep. Knight should be open to dialogue as well. I strongly disagree with your statement that 1/3 of Alabama families would see their taxes increase dramatically under this plan. I would like to know the source of your numbers.
As for the small mom-and-pop businesses…only the ones who have an income well into six figures would be impacted by this act, and the impact would not be significant for the vast majority of them. In addition, the increases would not take effect until well into 2010 at the earliest (due to the fact that the referendum would have to go through the Governor, and ultimately to the people on a statewide ballot).
Now to the so-called “double taxation”. We already pay taxes on the same income twice, how is this any different? We are in the minority of states that allow individuals to write off the taxes they pay to the federal government, and Alabama cannot afford to be in that minority any longer.
While the end of year write-off sounds like a good plan in theory, you have to realize that negates the benefit of eliminating the tax for many of Alabama’s poorest citizens, as many of them don’t pay enough income tax to cover the amount of state sales tax they would be able to write-off. If the aim of this bill is what I understand it to be, then the benefit is significantly reduced with this approach. And as for illegal immigrants and tourists, there are any number of other taxes that these individuals pay and eliminating the tax on groceries is not going to significantly reduce the amount that we gain from either of these populations in the state coffers.
Your second counterproposal would involve an effective reduction in the amount of funds going to our schools. It’s much the same thinking that the Governor is attempting to use with the stimulus dollars and its wrong-headed. You can’t achieve the worthy end of eliminating the grocery tax by making Alabama’s children pay with fewer resources for their education.
Again, I agree that there should be dialogue, but I don’t view either of the alternatives you proposed as viable as presented.
Thank you again for your time and engagement.
Sincerely,
Kristopher
Popular Posts