Polls

What is your preferred method to balance the Alabama education budget?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Blog Rating

Average blog rating:

9.4

Montgomery City Council rejects discount drug program 7-2

As I discussed here yesterday, this whole deal with the prescription drug discount cards seems to be a little fishy. This is a program that has been implemented successfully in cities across the country and in Alabama…and has saved those cities money on prescription drugs. However, Montgomery’s “risk manager” did a “study” and determined that apparently Montgomery is in some sort of black hole where it would, in fact, cost people more.

The whole thing seems really fishy to me…I think there is more to this story, possibly having to do with local pharmacists who didn’t want to buy into the program run by CVS/Caremark, possibly something else. Stay tuned…

Montgomery City Council rejects discount drug program 7-2 | montgomeryadvertiser.com | Montgomery Advertiser.

Montgomery Considering Drug Savings Program that Doesn’t Provide Savings?

I’m trying to gather some more information on this story, so you may see an update later in the day. However, the Montgomery Advertiser is reporting this morning that the City of Montgomery is considering adopting a prescription drug savings card program through CVS/Caremark and the National League of Cities, that by their own analysis doesn’t provide much savings and may actually cost cardholders extra money. What?

In some cases, the “discounted price” with the card was higher than the average over-the-counter cost. Overall, the discount card price for brand names was 4 percent cheaper than the average market price, known as the usual and customary cost, and almost 12 percent higher for generic drugs.

Overall, the discount price for all the prescriptions analyzed in the city’s study was less than 1 percent lower than the usual and customary price.

National League of Cities spokesman Gregory Minchak said the findings are in some ways irrelevant to the purpose of the program because the customer should not be charged the higher rate when the program’s price is not the lowest.

“If you present the card, you’re supposed to get the cheapest price,” Minchak said.

But some Montgomery pharmacists said their systems are not able to discern when the discounted price actually is higher than the average consumer price, meaning an uninsured cardholder actually could pay more with the card.

This sounds like one of those things where what is supposed to happen in policy is not possible under real world conditions and the consumer gets sold a bill of goods.

UPDATE: There’s some additional detail in an article out of Opelika about some similar complaints…it seems this may be more about local pharmacies playing politics than it is about the actual effectiveness of the program.

City analysis finds drug program savings minimal | montgomeryadvertiser.com | Montgomery Advertiser.

Mayors of Pike Road and Montgomery Working Things Out

This is the kind of thing we see far too little of nowadays. I applaud both Montgomery Mayor Todd Strange and my mayor, Pike Road’s Gordon Stone for trying to come to an amicable solution the border dispute that has bouncing in and out of the courts for the last several years.

The two sides also intend to come to an agreement that, as much as possible, will not block the other from expanding, will make neighborhoods whole again and will keep both parties out of a courtroom.

The two mayors have been in talks since Strange took office in March after succeeding now Congressman Bobby Bright.

Strange said he and Stone are about “90 percent” through the process, which likely will conclude with a judge formally recognizing whatever agreement the two sides reach.

“I think it’s just good, sound business practice to not have the court determine the outcomes and for it to be worked out between leadership — and that’s what we’re trying to do,” Stone said.

The specifics are still being hashed out, but both mayors said the rest of the process will determine how to define boundary lines while respecting the wishes of property owners.

Neither said how clear the boundary lines would be, but as of today, the properties in the two municipalities create a confusing hodgepodge in east Montgomery County.

No doubt, it is extremely confusing and the idea that we may finally get a resolution is a relief to everyone who lives out in this area. There is no need for it to have gotten to where it has and I am thrilled to hear that we may have a resolution soon.

Montgomery Advertiser – Mayors Team Up to Resolve Annex Dispute

What to Do with Garrett Coliseum

There is yet another story this morning about the dire need for repairs and upgrades at Garrett Coliseum. It’s amazing the facility has been able to continue to operate this long. I was surprised to read that the state owns the facility, but provides very little support to it. I applaud Commissioner Reed Ingram for taking an interest as a new member of the board in charge of the facility. But simply applying for grants is not going to get the job done.

This is one of those times when we have to make a decision, either you’re going to support making it a safe and useful facility, or cut it loose. I believe Garrett Coliseum is worth upgrading and maintaining for the next several decades, but it will take a significant investment to make that happen. In lieu of grants, I would be pursuing funding from prominent members of the community through their wills. There are certainly a number of people in the community who could offer a substantial gift to the Coliseum and have their name placed alongside that of Mr. Garrett as the people who helped keep the facility alive. The city, county and state certainly have an obligation to keep the facility operating, but the long-term upgrades that are needed are not likely to find funding there.

Garrett Coliseum in dire need of repair | montgomeryadvertiser.com | Montgomery Advertiser.