Polls

Which Alabama legislator is most effective at using Twitter?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Blog Rating

Average blog rating:

9.4

Could this week get any worse for Troy King?

This could very well be remembered as the week that ended Troy King’s political career…

First, a scathing editorial runs in the Washington Times, saying, amongst other things:

Sometimes paying to sue just doesn’t pay. In a case with major national implications, the Alabama state Supreme Court gave a huge and well-deserved spanking Friday to Alabama Attorney General Troy King and the wealthy trial lawyers he is figuratively in bed with.

Applause and kudos to the Times’ editorial board for getting a shot in on PAC-to-PAC transfers in Alabama as well:

In the Alabama case, longtime kingpin trial lawyer Jere Beasley was carrying the case against the drug companies. Is it any wonder, then, that Mr. Beasley and his wife Sarah in 2006 donated a total of $50,000 in a single day, broken up among four separate political action committees all officially chaired by Montgomery lobbyist Johnny Crawford, only to have a fifth Crawford PAC donate the exact same total of $50,000 to Mr. King’s campaign the very same day? (In Alabama, PACs are free to move money back and forth among each other as many times as they want.)

I am a little surprised they left out the fawning treatment that Jere Beasley has been giving to Troy King on his blog , but they made their point.

Then, his Republican primary opponent Luther Strange hit him between the eyes with the worst news he could have gotten in the battle over endorsements this morning, both US Senator Jeff Session and Senator Richard Shelby are endorsing Strange.  Both senators have supported King in the past, which just makes the slight that much more painful.  As much opposition as there has been to Troy King within the Republican party since the day he was appointed, and that has only grown over time, it has rarely been apparent to those who don’t run in political circles.  Now they will see it in the persons of the highest ranking federal elected officials in the state switching allegiances:

“Senator Shelby has worked and been close family friends with Luther Strange for 30 years and has total confidence in Luther’s abilities,” said Shelby spokesman Jonathan Graffeo.

“The people of Alabama will have to make up their own minds, but I have a high opinion of Luther and I think he would make a fine attorney general,” said Sessions, through a spokesman.

Chris Brown, a spokesman for King’s campaign, said King respects Shelby and Sessions but, “He’d rather get his votes from the voters instead of some people in Washington.”

So, our sitting US Senators are just some people in Washington?  Okay…  In the King camp’s defense, when I heard this news this morning I didn’t have the first clue how to go about spinning it.  And what they went with was in line with the best responses I heard today.

I honestly don’t know how the sitting Attorney General of Alabama recovers from this…but it will be interesting to watch.

Speaking of watching…King tweeted that he granted an interview to CBS 8 News in Montgomery today.  I’ll post a link if the video is posted.

UPDATE:  The Montgomery Advertiser’s editorial board has their own take on Troy’s situation.

Obama’s Speech on Healthcare and Alabama Reaction

President Obama delivered his remarks on healthcare reform before a joint session of Congress this evening. Of course, the most interesting portion of the speech from an Alabama perspective, was when the president mentioned our state as an example of the worst of insurance company monopolies, but Blue Cross of Alabama has been disputing the percentage cited by the president.

And Alabama politicians reacted:

***Alabama gubernatorial candidate and Dr. Robert Bentley offered this:

As I have traveled the state and talked to people one-on-one and in town halls, the resounding message from Alabama voters is that they do not want Washington interfering in their health care,” he also said. Dr. Bentley’s plan for health care calls for four basic reforms: 1) Lawsuit reform to lower costs of medical malpractice insurance; 2) Allowing health insurance to be purchased across state lines, increasing competition and lowering costs; 3) Expanding the utilization of health savings accounts coupled with high-deductible health insurance plans to put consumerism back into health care; and 4) Creating a state and federal tax deduction for individuals purchasing health insurance on their own.

***Tim James was one of the first to respond with a blog entry that said in part:

It is difficult to really know what plan the President wants, because he is very careful to speak only in generalities. Much of what he says, we all agree with. Americans should have a variety of plans to choose from. Those plans should be affordable. Medical malpractice reform is necessary. We should find a way to deal with pre-existing conditions.

Unfortunately, much of what the President said tonight was just a repeat of the generalities he has spoken over the past several months. His efforts to blame Republicans will not work. The American people are smart people. Hundreds of thousands of them have taken the time to do what Congress hasn’t – they have actually read the bills. They know that the House Bill provides for a Public Option. They also know that they will not accept that.

***Senator Shelby focused on the public option in his written remarks:

The President tonight expressed his continued support for a public option, but still provided few specifics as to how it would be paid for,” Shelby said in a statement. “He also failed to explain how a public option would not lead to a government takeover and rationing of health care. There are sensible and positive reforms that we can pursue to build on the strengths of our current system, but as long as the President continues to pursue a government-run plan I remain in strong opposition.

And my thoughts? I didn’t hear anything unexpected. I was glad to hear the conviction from the president to make this happen, and laying a few more specifics onto his general parameters, but the details of a plan that Congress is able to get passed still have to materialize. I was very pleased to see him continue to embrace good ideas from the opposing side of the aisle, while also being as plain as possible about the lies that have been perpetrated. And I hope that everyone recognizes Congressman Wilson’s screaming “you lie” at the president was inappropriate and wrong, but maybe a starting point for ratcheting down the rhetoric.

Myths on Both Sides in Healthcare Debate

I came across an excellent column about the myths on both sides of the healthcare debate this morning from a writer in Maine named Gordon Weil, because he starts out debunking myths being spread by our own Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL)

Myth 1. Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., says that Obama risks “destroying the best health-care system the world has ever known.” In reality, it is far from the best.

Because an estimated 50 million Americans do not have any health insurance, they have little access and get less care. For them, we do not have the best system.

Life expectancy in Japan, France and many other countries is greater than in the U.S. Infant mortality is higher in the U.S. than in many other countries.

We rank first in only two categories. We spend more per person on health care than any other country, and we have the best emergency rooms.

Myth 2. Shelby says there is a “marketplace for health care” — competition among insurers and providers that supposedly produces lower costs and the best care.

But care is not the best. And the federal government itself has banned competition in drug pricing under prescription insurance plans.

Recently, we learned that health care costs in McAllen, Texas, were the highest in the country because almost all doctors there ordered tests without limit. Average medical costs were higher than average income.

What kind of marketplace is that?

In Rochester, Minn., where the famed Mayo Clinic is located, costs were little more than one-third of the McAllen “market.”

The healthcare system we have is far from the best in the world, though we do have the best doctors, hospitals and the latest and greatest technology. The problem is that in order to have a good healthcare system, you have to have ALL citizens getting healthcare, until we fill that gap, we will continue to lag behind the rest of the world.

And on the other side he offers the following myths,

Myth 6. We can reform health care without raising taxes.

You cannot cover millions more people without added cost. If government mandates more coverage, government should pay for it. That means higher taxes or more debt.

The only way to lower costs and cover more people would be a single-payer system. Taxes would replace insurance premiums. Covering added costs through savings is an empty promise.

Even if government purchasing power lowers some costs, health-care reform means somebody’s taxes will increase.

Myth 7. Obama has a health-care plan.

Having seen the failure of President Clinton’s effort to impose a plan, Obama is leaving too much to Congress. He needs to take charge.

As much as many want to lay the responsibility for the plans currently working their way through Congress firmly at the feet of the President, the issue is that he did not propose a detailed plan and is not dictating the details to Congress. He started to lay out a few additional parameters this week, but he needs to do more to chart the course for Congress and keep the bill-writing process moving. Otherwise, it will stagnate and the opportunity to get a deal done this year will be lost.

Too many millions of Americans have gone too long without affordable, accessible healthcare and we cannot let this opportunity slip away. I know the President knows that, but he needs to start providing the strong leadership needed to get it done.

Health-care debate complicated by myths from both sides.

And People Wonder Why Politicians are So Disliked

Senator Shelby gives us a prime case study…

Shelby, a member of the powerful Appropriations Committee, is known for steering money to his state — and that’s evident in the bill Congress is expected to pass this week.

Shelby says securing that money is part of his job.

“The people of Alabama elected me to represent their interests in Washington, and I am willing to defend any funding or project I have secured for Alabama,” he said. “I firmly believe that elected officials, not bureaucrats, should be stewards of taxpayer dollars.”

The projects are included in a $410 billion spending bill that the House passed Feb. 25 and the Senate is expected to consider early this week.

While Shelby and other lawmakers defend the pet projects — called earmarks — they’ve tucked into the bill, some of their Republican colleagues want them eliminated.

Shelby ranks ninth among senators for the cost of all the earmarks in the spending bill that bears his name, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense, a government watchdog group.

So the man who said the stimulus package was a big waste of money sees no problem with steering over $100 million for his interests. Because, don’t get me wrong, it his job to represent Alabama’s interests, but it’s also one of the easiest paths to ensure he keeps his job.

via Shelby defends earmarks on spending bill | montgomeryadvertiser.com | Montgomery Advertiser.