Polls

What is your preferred method to balance the Alabama education budget?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Blog Rating

Average blog rating:

9.3

Why I Support the Elimination of the Grocery Tax

This says it all, thanks so much for all you do Kimble,

Grocery tax bill would modernize Alabama taxes
By Kimble Forrister

In the last two weeks, legislators have spent a lot of time arguing for and
against Rep. John Knight’s plan to lower grocery taxes and cap a lopsided
deduction.

This might be a good time to step back and consider how Alabama’s tax system
became so flawed and outdated that it ranks worst for taxing workers at the
poverty line and ties for worst on taxing groceries.

It wasn’t intentional.

Nobody ever consciously decided to make Alabama and Mississippi the only
states that apply the full sales tax to groceries. Decades ago, quite a few
states taxed groceries. Over the years, reformers in these states mounted
campaigns to lower their states’ reliance on grocery taxes. Only two states
stubbornly refused to update their tax systems.

Similarly, nobody ever sat down and decided Alabama should have the highest
income tax at the poverty line. Instead, we designed a progressive income
tax in 1935 with generous exemptions for the necessities of life, but for 70
years we failed to make adjustments for inflation.

The same goes for the state income tax deduction for federal income tax. It
has been in place for four decades. Nobody intended back in 1965 to give the
majority of the benefit to the top 3 percent of earners. Over the years,
income inequality has grown, and this deduction has grown more lopsided. If
you earn less than $100,000 a year, it lowers your state tax bill by less
than $100. If you’re among the one percent who make more than $400,000 a
year, it cuts your tax bill by $15,000 on average.

It doesn’t make sense to offer a lopsided deduction that lowers taxes by
less than $100 for the vast majority, but 150 times that much for the very
few. Good tax policy offers deductions that are roughly the same size. For
example, the personal exemption on Alabama’s income tax is $1,500 for every
Alabama adult, rich or poor. The homestead exemption exempts the first
$40,000 of value of your house, whether it’s a shack or a mansion.

Because last century’s lawmakers failed to make regular updates, we have
inherited a tax system that’s holding us back. Our education and health
systems can’t keep pace with our neighbors because our tax system is tilted.
It gets too much of its revenue from heavy sales and income taxes on middle-
and low-income workers, while it gives enormous deductions to those with the
largest incomes.

There’s a way to improve the balance of the system: cap the lopsided
deduction and lower the tax on groceries.

Last year Rep. John Knight and Alabama Arise came within one vote of passing
a grocery tax reduction. In an attempt to find one more Senate supporter,
Rep. Knight kept ratcheting his plan closer and closer to the version Gov.
Bob Riley had proposed. But diehard opponents would have none of it. They
said we were trying to raise taxes on “the people I represent” and lower
taxes on everyone else.

This year Knight cut his bill down to two parts: his own plan to remove the
4 percent sales tax on groceries, and Republican Rep. Robert Bentley’s plan
to cap the deduction for federal income taxes paid. With these changes, the
plan trimmed the number who would pay a higher tax bill from 20 percent down
to 5 percent. But the diehard opponents still want none of it.

In fact, Sen. Larry Dixon argues that it’s a trick of “the left” to reduce
the number who pay more as a divide-and-conquer strategy. Ironically, it was
Republican Gov. Bob Riley who proposed capping the deduction last year.
Riley’s plan would have allowed most to keep the deduction, but would have
removed it for those at the top.

There’s one last argument we need to address. Some opponents are challenging
the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s estimate that a family of four spends
$225 a week on groceries. They find it hard to imagine that families really
spend that much on groceries.

The USDA says the “Moderate Cost Food Plan” was $225.10 a week for a family
of four last November. If a legislator and spouse eat all their meals at
home with no children, the USDA says they pay $125.60 a week. You can find
your family on the chart by going to www.cnpp.usda.gov and clicking on “USDA
Food Plans: Cost of Food.”

If you eat out a lot, and you forget to take your lunch to work, your annual
grocery tax savings might work out to less than $100 a person in your
family. Whatever the amount, it will help you make ends meet in a time of
hardship. Put together with the tax savings of 4 million Alabamians, it’s a
$400 million economic stimulus for Main Street Alabama. And it moves a
tilted tax system one step closer to the 21st century.

Kimble Forrister is state coordinator of Alabama Arise, a statewide
coalition of 150 congregations and organizations that promote state policies
to improve the lives of low-income Alabamians.

Kimble Forrister
Arise Citizens’ Policy Project
P. O. Box 1188
Montgomery, AL 36101
(334) 832-9060

Reason Why ALFA So Strongly Opposes the Removal of the Grocery Tax

This is the most coherent explanation I’ve seen to date as to why ALFA and big business interests in Alabama are so strongly opposing the Tax Fairness Act.

The reason ALFA and other big multi-state business interests oppose the bill is that the Alabama code allows them to deduct their entire federal tax bill from their Alabama income taxes. If a LLC has operations in several states and pays federal taxes on all those operations, their Alabama operation gets to deduct all those other state operation’s federal taxes on their Alabama return. I hear that this actually allows the Alabama operation to show no taxable income for Alabama income tax purposes. ALFA oposes it because many of the multi-state farming operations apparently do this.

I’m not saying that everyone who is voting against this bill is voting against it because of certain lobbyists, but there is no question that for some it is the main reason.

Left In Alabama:: Bill to remove sales taxes from food fails again.

When is Enough, Enough?

Callie Corley did a great job of laying out the frustration over the Tax Fairness Act, the bill to remove the tax on groceries.

Crimson White – When is enough, enough?.

My Conversation with Representative Greg Wren on the Tax Fairness Act – Part 2

I did receive a response from Rep. Wren to my earlier communication:

Kristopher,
I appreciate your views regarding HB116 and would like a chance to share a few thoughts of mine regarding this issue.

Under the Knight plan, approximately one-third of taxpaying families in the state would see their taxes increase dramatically, and small mom-and-pop businesses organized as limited liability companies would experience substantial increases at this time of unprecedented economic turmoil.

The Knight plan would also allow the state to double tax income by demanding that citizens pay state tax on income that never made it in the pockets but, instead, went to federal income taxes. In short, the bill places a tax on your taxes.

There are alternative methods to removing the sales tax on groceries. For instance one plan used in Idaho and supported by Alabama House Republicans, provides citizens who file state returns with a year-end rebate for the grocery taxes they pay. Because sales taxes are the only taxes that certain groups, such as illegal immigrants, actually pay, we can provide tax relief to Alabamians while ensuring those who are here illegally are contributing something to the state. Tourists and visitors from out-of-state would pay the sales taxes, as well, while in-state residents would be exempt.

Another solution offered by the Republican Caucus would phase in the removal of the state sales tax on food based on growth in the ETF and without increasing taxes on any individual or joint taxpayer. We continue to await the Democrats allowing consideration of a counter plan.

I hope that Republicans and Democrats alike can continue this discussion. During this time of record job losses and economic recession I realize that a 4% sales tax relief would be beneficial to citizens across the State of Alabama.

Thanks again for your comments.

Representative Greg Wren
Alabama House of Representatives
4213 Carmichael Road
Montgomery, AL 36106
334-395-0123 (O)
334-396-4787 (F)
www.gregwren.com

And I have responded to him as well:

Rep. Wren,

Again, I appreciate your willingness to dialogue on this issue, and I agree that Rep. Knight should be open to dialogue as well. I strongly disagree with your statement that 1/3 of Alabama families would see their taxes increase dramatically under this plan. I would like to know the source of your numbers.

As for the small mom-and-pop businesses…only the ones who have an income well into six figures would be impacted by this act, and the impact would not be significant for the vast majority of them. In addition, the increases would not take effect until well into 2010 at the earliest (due to the fact that the referendum would have to go through the Governor, and ultimately to the people on a statewide ballot).

Now to the so-called “double taxation”. We already pay taxes on the same income twice, how is this any different? We are in the minority of states that allow individuals to write off the taxes they pay to the federal government, and Alabama cannot afford to be in that minority any longer.

While the end of year write-off sounds like a good plan in theory, you have to realize that negates the benefit of eliminating the tax for many of Alabama’s poorest citizens, as many of them don’t pay enough income tax to cover the amount of state sales tax they would be able to write-off. If the aim of this bill is what I understand it to be, then the benefit is significantly reduced with this approach. And as for illegal immigrants and tourists, there are any number of other taxes that these individuals pay and eliminating the tax on groceries is not going to significantly reduce the amount that we gain from either of these populations in the state coffers.

Your second counterproposal would involve an effective reduction in the amount of funds going to our schools. It’s much the same thinking that the Governor is attempting to use with the stimulus dollars and its wrong-headed. You can’t achieve the worthy end of eliminating the grocery tax by making Alabama’s children pay with fewer resources for their education.

Again, I agree that there should be dialogue, but I don’t view either of the alternatives you proposed as viable as presented.

Thank you again for your time and engagement.

Sincerely,

Kristopher